Thursday, 28 February 2013
Conflux & Ditmar
I will be going to my first Conflux Conference at the end of April. Conflux is an annual Speculative fiction conference in Canberra. I'm going because I want to, and because I'm running a workshop. I'm running a workshop at Conflux because they asked for workshop submissions and accepted mine.
My workshop is called, "A mile in their shoes', the details can be found here on the Conflux web-sight. It's on at 8 am on the last day of the conference, so I'm expecting massive numbers. If you are going to Conflux this year, consider coming to my workshop.
Conflux is also the venue for 2013's Natcon, The 52nd Australian National Science Fiction Convention. Which means that it will host the Ditmars, The annual national award for Speculative Fiction writing and other related stuff. You can read about the Ditmars here.
It just so happens that I have two short stories that are eligible for nomination in this years Ditmars. What happens is that leading up to the Natcon eligible voters nominate their Favorited stories. The five stories with the most nominations are then voted for and the winners announced at the Natcon its self. The rules are explain fully here.
Just in case you are an eligible voter who may happen to want to nominate one of my stories. My stories are "Crossroads" and "Leprechaun in the Backyard" and can be found in the short story section of the Ditmar eligibility list found here. The place you nominate my stories, and others that you may feel are worthy is here.
I hope I see you are Conflux.
Tuesday, 26 February 2013
Rejection, the pain, the pain!
One of my stories got rejected about a week ago, it's taken me this long to have the strength to write about it. (Sob) It was so very quick. It submitted my story to a magazine, I won't name it, and expected it to be many weeks, or even months, before I'd know, but it was all over in less than two weeks.
The publication has a three level vetting process. In just six days my story passed the first stage, some wonderful person had read my story and said, 'yes', it was good enough for stage two. I was informed that stage two would take about 2-3 weeks for my story to work through stage two, a three reader assessment. Not to be, it only took seven days for a sorry, email to come. Rejection, the pain, the pain!
But wait! There had been a promise of feedback. I had even heard from others that the feedback was detailed and constructive. I opened the email with anticipation and found this:
"With a bit more showing and a lot less telling, and a bit of tightening here and there, this could be a nice read."
Not what I had expected.
Now, to be fair, any feedback, sincerely given, is good feedback, and the readers in this vetting process are volunteers. So, I'm grateful that they took the time to read my story, and for any feedback they have the time to give. However, what do I make of this? For the whole thing there are positives and negatives.
Negatives:
- Rejection, the pain, the pain!
- A kick in the ego.
- Much less feedback than I would have hoped for.
Positives:
- At least one person read and like the story, I got past round one.
- A kick in the ego.
- A very quick turn around.
- Some feedback I can work with.
- There is hope for this story.
I am sure that this whole experience has helped me in my writing journey. The feedback was only one line, but it was one line I didn't have before. I believe I know where I need to show (and not tell) more and this knowledge will help to make the story stronger. As for the tightening, I have no idea, but I'll try and work it out.
I know this will make me a better writer.
Wednesday, 13 February 2013
Anywhere but Earth – A Review
This anthology is full of firsts for me. It
was first lunched at my first spec-fic event just after I’d written my first
short story. It’s also the first science fiction I bought on my Kindle. With
all these first, I’m glad to report that it is a first rate book.
It’s also a big book, its physical size
really stood out when I first saw it. I’m actually glad I was able to buy it on
Kindle. Its size is because there are a lot of stories, 27 in all. With so many
stories I’d expected to find some stories that I didn't like, but I didn't
There were some stories I thought I wasn't going to like; for example, a story
that started with a single nude man on a beach and a love story with a time twist.
There were some stories I would have disliked if they weren't so well written;
for example, a story with an almost two clever twist and an intergalactic sex parasite.
However, most stories I just enjoyed from the start to finish.
Just as there were no bad stories, no
stories stood out as way above the rest. There’s a nice balance, no bad stories,
many very good stories, no stories that over shadow the rest. I did have a
favourite. It was a story of a man on a planet that has lost its stars who is
sent by his boss to kill something in a town no one can find.
I've not mentioned any story titles on
purpose. If you want to know which stories I’m talking about, buy the book.
Tuesday, 12 February 2013
One Step Closer - The Proof

In Fabula-Divino
Today I received the Proof for the upcoming In Fabula-Divino anthology that includes my story, 'Crossroads'. The Proof is the final stage before printing where the author makes sure that no errors have crept into the text during the formatting stage to prepare for print. At least that is how I understand it.
The editor, the wonderful Nicole Murphy, has generously sent the whole book, not just our stories, which we have to proof. This means that in a week or so I'll be able to tell you just how wonderful all the stories. I will, of course, be completely unbiased.
The anthology is scheduled for release on the 11 of March, and is on schedule. To find out more you can go to the In Fabula-Divino web site.
Wednesday, 6 February 2013
Re-submission time
I haven't really submitted any work for publication for a while because I've started working on my first novel. Writing a novel takes a lot of time. Anyway, I do have some old work that hasn't yet found a home so I've re-work and re-submitted them to new markets.
Is re-submitting the right word? This question popped into my head as I wrote the above lines. Both the stories have been rejected in the past, but I'm submitting them to a new audience, not the ones that rejected them the first time (In one case, a first and second time.) I'm still really new to all this and so something that an experienced writers would know is an unknown to me.
Well, time will tell if these two stories find a home this time. I will let you know when I do.
I also don't know if it's ok to mention where I've sent them. The two stories are mine, so I'm sure it's not a problem for me to tell you about a little them, so I will.
The story that has tried and failed twice is the first story I ever wrote. It's called Bounty. It's the story of a meeting between a bounty hunter and a young boy. It's set in a world where both science and magic operate. The boy is an apprentice mage, while the bounty hunter embraces science and is hunting the boys master. I first entered it in an International short story writing contest. Looking back, I can safely say it didn't deserve to win anything, it was a mess. I read it to my writers group and helped me improve it greatly. So, had a go at submitting it to a major international Science Fiction Magazine. I got my first, 'Sorry, your story has been rejected', letter. I've not submitted it to an Australian publication.
The other story is a flash fiction piece. It's called 'Mouse' and it is very short. I previously submitted it to an international flash fiction contest. I received positive feed back from the judges, but did not win a prize. Again, I've submitted more locally this time.
Sunday, 27 January 2013
What makes a good read in one word; compelling!
I've recently finished reading Ender's Game. A book I had already heard a lot about. I even knew most of the plot, including the twist at the end. People have very mixed reactions to Ender's Game. Some praise it as one of the all time classics of SciFi, others totally trash it a rubbish, with very few taking a more moderate position either way. I was really curious as to how I would feel about it, what would be my response.
Even though I knew how it ended, even though I saw, and mostly agreed with, the faults other people had noted, I found Ender's Game compelling. It was compelling in the sense that I just didn't want to stop reading. It was like, just finish the chapter, just read a bit more, may as well finish this chapter now, one more page, etc. I think that there was only two times when I was happy to stop and take a break.
This got me thinking about what makes a good book, and I realised that for me it was how much I wanted to keep reading, how compelling it is. This has lead me to try and create a compelling rating system. I goes something light this:
Not Compelling: A book I just don't finish, or only finish because I have to. There have been a small number of SciFi/fantasy books that have fallen into this rating for me over the years. These may not have been bad books, they are just books that didn't hold my interest. The most recent case was a book my wife brought for me a a garage sale (I've gotten a lot of great books from garage sales). It had fully fleshed out characters, a well built universe and what seemed like a well throughout plot. Despite all this, I got to the point where I just could not be bothered, and started reading something else.
Sometimes Compelling: Duncan Lay's "The Dragon Sword Histories" fell into this rating for me. I think Duncan writes good books, but I only sometimes found myself desperate to read that one more page. I was most during his battle sense, or the tension he created in their lead up.
Often Compelling: Basically everything I've read by Jennifer Fallon falls into this rating. I've read three of her series, The Demon Child Trilogy, The Second Sons Trilogy and The Tide Lords, and she is very consistent in her quality. Although I found the end of Tide Lords a big let down.
Mostly Compelling: Karen Miller's Godspeaker trilogy fell into this rating for me. Also, Richard Harland's Worldshaker fits here. There was just a few bits where I was thinking, 'skip a bit'.
Compelling: This is where Ender's Game belongs for me, just could not put it down.
Totally Compelling: Because I've only just read A Game of Thrones, the first book in the A Song of Fire and Ice series by George R. R. Martin late last year. Not only was it a mammoth struggle to put down, but when I finally did, I dreamed it.
Even though I knew how it ended, even though I saw, and mostly agreed with, the faults other people had noted, I found Ender's Game compelling. It was compelling in the sense that I just didn't want to stop reading. It was like, just finish the chapter, just read a bit more, may as well finish this chapter now, one more page, etc. I think that there was only two times when I was happy to stop and take a break.
This got me thinking about what makes a good book, and I realised that for me it was how much I wanted to keep reading, how compelling it is. This has lead me to try and create a compelling rating system. I goes something light this:
Not Compelling: A book I just don't finish, or only finish because I have to. There have been a small number of SciFi/fantasy books that have fallen into this rating for me over the years. These may not have been bad books, they are just books that didn't hold my interest. The most recent case was a book my wife brought for me a a garage sale (I've gotten a lot of great books from garage sales). It had fully fleshed out characters, a well built universe and what seemed like a well throughout plot. Despite all this, I got to the point where I just could not be bothered, and started reading something else.
Sometimes Compelling: Duncan Lay's "The Dragon Sword Histories" fell into this rating for me. I think Duncan writes good books, but I only sometimes found myself desperate to read that one more page. I was most during his battle sense, or the tension he created in their lead up.
Often Compelling: Basically everything I've read by Jennifer Fallon falls into this rating. I've read three of her series, The Demon Child Trilogy, The Second Sons Trilogy and The Tide Lords, and she is very consistent in her quality. Although I found the end of Tide Lords a big let down.
Mostly Compelling: Karen Miller's Godspeaker trilogy fell into this rating for me. Also, Richard Harland's Worldshaker fits here. There was just a few bits where I was thinking, 'skip a bit'.
Compelling: This is where Ender's Game belongs for me, just could not put it down.
Totally Compelling: Because I've only just read A Game of Thrones, the first book in the A Song of Fire and Ice series by George R. R. Martin late last year. Not only was it a mammoth struggle to put down, but when I finally did, I dreamed it.
Tuesday, 8 January 2013
My story in print: I'm excited
On the 11 of March the anthology "In Fabula-divino 1" will be launched!
This will include the 8 stories (including mine) that were published for a month on the In Fabula-divino web site in 2012, and for stories by more established artists. Below is the table of contents.
This will include the 8 stories (including mine) that were published for a month on the In Fabula-divino web site in 2012, and for stories by more established artists. Below is the table of contents.
Kevin J Anderson and Rebecca Moesta – Sea Dreams
Lily Ariser – A New Ever After
Trudi Canavan – A Good Yarn
A E Decker – In The Woods
Janett L Grady – Stay Out of the Park
Holly Kench – The Secret Life of a Zombie Fan
P J Keuning – Crossroads
S G Larner – Regret
Tony Owens – Digging Out the Ribs of Gold
Joseph W Patterson – Franklin’s Rainbow
Angela Slatter – Dresses, Three
Kaaron Warren – White Bed
You can go to the In Fabula-divino to learn more about the writers.
If you look closely at the cover (above) you can see lines from, and pictures representing, the 8 stories from the web sight. Mine line is in the middle under the armoured lady, which is the picture for my story.
The line quoted is "Duel with the woman Melville, and be done with it."
You will be hearing more about this!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

